Feedback

Useful lesson for society and politicians: Mikheil Saakashvili trial

Author : Oleksandr Koshovyi

A useful lesson that could be learned from the situation is that the prosecutor general’s charges should be voided in the court, not in the parliament
11:39, 13 December 2017

Read the original text at 112.ua.

pravda.com.ua

The charges, de facto, made by the Attorney General against the former president of Georgia in the walls of the parliament, sounded profound. Although they were ridiculous. The most important thing is that although the indictments have been presented as an established fact, they have not yet been approved by the trial. This fact leaves us tangled: the Attorney General confused the circus dome with the parliamentary one?

Related: Prosecutor General’s Office calls Saakashvili for questioning on December 18

The situation with the detention of Mikheil Saakashvili looked ridiculous, and so it did not find a clear explanation by the law enforcement officers, their devastating failure in court was the peak of the situation.

However, existential questions to the prosecutor's office remain unanswered. The key one is: how should the criminal process be conducted in order not to provoke the civil society to start a new revolution? Of course, the question is quite unexpected for a civilized society. But his general activity was set by the Attorney General himself.

Related: I meet colossal pressure in Saakashvili case, - Prosecutor General

A useful lesson could be learned from the situation that prosecutor general’s charges should be voided in the court, not in the parliament. This is a way civilized people act. It is a legal, political, and human.

Even a defender of the Stalin totalitarian regime, Vyshinsky, did not ignore his speeches in court's proceedings. And what about the prosecutor general of Ukraine? He is showing antipathy. Instead of going to the court, he went to the parliament to present his accusations.

Related: US State Department expects fair trial for Saakashvili, - US Ambassador to Georgia

In terms of a public court hearing that have at least some signs of adversity, hot emotional assaults of justice based on phobias and a specific understanding of causal relationships, the person "without qualified legal education," as Lutsenko once called himself, looks unconvincing. And sometimes it is just funny. The facts should be supported by understandable and measurable proofs.

Related: Saakashvili to continue his political activity

After all, any violations of the principles and procedures carried out in the pre-trial investigation can be easily corrected by a simple "swing of a gavel" of the Themis servant. Even in our Ukrainian not-reformed court.

Related: Preventive measure for Saakashvili: court not granted house arrest

The key issue that ensures this justice is the openness of the court session itself. Experience shows that the openness and publicity of the judicial process today (the lack of trust in the judicial system as a whole) is a pledge of competition and ultimately a fair decision.

The most important thing is that in this case, society has the opportunity to make its own conclusions. Sometimes the one that can help to correct the mistakes made in the court.

Related: Tymoshenko is ready to bail Saakashvili

Topics:
Система Orphus

If you find an error, highlight the desired text and press Ctrl + Enter, to tell about it

Comments
see more